Monday, December 18, 2006

STRINGY THEORY.


String theory is the theory that the smallest particles (atoms, and quarks) are made up of strings. The theory is that these tiny strings are never still, but instead vibrate. Also they vibrate in many different ways. I.E- if it vibrates one way it makes a neutrons, electrons, and another way a protons and so on and so on. So saying that the world, is not made up of quarks, but tiny strings. The difference between string theory and Quantum Physics. is that string theory embraces gravity and quantum physics does not. So this is my brief on string theory and now to let the pro's explain what really happens. (p.s.- I only post what i understand.)

We live in a wonderfully complex universe, and we are curious about it by nature. Time and again we have wondered--- why are we here? Where did we and the world come from? What is the world made of? It is our privilege to live in a time when enormous progress has been made towards finding some of the answers. String theory is our most recent attempt to answer the last (and part of the second) question.

So, what is the world made of? Ordinary matter is made of atoms, which are in turn made of just three basic components: electrons whirling around a nucleus composed of neutrons and protons. The electron is a truly fundamental particle (it is one of a family of particles known as leptons), but neutrons and protons are made of smaller particles, known as quarks. Quarks are, as far as we know, truly elementary.

Our current knowledge about the subatomic composition of the universe is summarized in what is known as the Standard Model of particle physics. It describes both the fundamental building blocks out of which the world is made, and the forces through which these blocks interact. There are twelve basic building blocks. Six of these are quarks--- they go by the interesting names of up, down, charm, strange, bottom and top. (A proton, for instance, is made of two up quarks and one down quark.) The other six are leptons--- these include the electron and its two heavier siblings, the muon and the tauon, as well as three neutrinos.

There are four fundamental forces in the universe: gravity, electromagnetism, and the weak and strong nuclear forces. Each of these is produced by fundamental particles that act as carriers of the force. The most familiar of these is the photon, a particle of light, which is the mediator of electromagnetic forces. (This means that, for instance, a magnet attracts a nail because both objects exchange photons.) The graviton is the particle associated with gravity. The strong force is carried by eight particles known as gluons. Finally, the weak force is transmitted by three particles, the W+, the W- , and the Z.

The behavior of all of these particles and forces is described with impeccable precision by the Standard Model, with one notable exception: gravity. For technical reasons, the gravitational force, the most familiar in our every day lives, has proven very difficult to describe microscopically. This has been for many years one of the most important problems in theoretical physics-- to formulate a quantum theory of gravity.

In the last few decades, string theory has emerged as the most promising candidate for a microscopic theory of gravity. And it is infinitely more ambitious than that: it attempts to provide a complete, unified, and consistent description of the fundamental structure of our universe. (For this reason it is sometimes, quite arrogantly, called a 'Theory of Everything').

The essential idea behind string theory is this: all of the different 'fundamental ' particles of the Standard Model are really just different manifestations of one basic object: a string. How can that be? Well, we would ordinarily picture an electron, for instance, as a point with no internal structure. A point cannot do anything but move. But, if string theory is correct, then under an extremely powerful 'microscope' we would realize that the electron is not really a point, but a tiny loop of string. A string can do something aside from moving--- it can oscillate in different ways. If it oscillates a certain way, then from a distance, unable to tell it is really a string, we see an electron. But if it oscillates some other way, well, then we call it a photon, or a quark, or a ... you get the idea. So, if string theory is correct, the entire world is made of strings!

Perhaps the most remarkable thing about string theory is that such a simple idea works--- it is possible to derive (an extension of) the Standard Model (which has been verified experimentally with incredible precision) from a theory of strings. But it should also be said that, to date, there is no direct experimental evidence that string theory itself is the correct description of Nature. This is mostly due to the fact that string theory is still under development. We know bits and pieces of it, but we do not yet see the whole picture, and we are therefore unable to make definite predictions. In recent years many exciting developments have taken place, radically improving our understanding of what the theory is.

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Schrödinger's cat



WOW THIS, IS ONE OF THE MOST INTERISTING SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY EVER.


Schrödinger's cat

Schrödinger's cat is a famous illustration of the principle in quantum theory of superposition, proposed by Erwin Schrödinger in 1935. Schrödinger's cat serves to demonstrate the apparent conflict between what quantum theory tells us is true about the nature and behavior of matter on the microscopic level and what we observe to be true about the nature and behavior of matter on the macroscopic level.
Here's Schrödinger's (theoretical) experiment: We place a living cat into a steel chamber, along with a device containing a vial of hydrocyanic acid. There is, in the chamber, a very small amount of a radioactive substance. If even a single atom of the substance decays during the test period, a relay mechanism will trip a hammer, which will, in turn, break the vial and kill the cat. The observer cannot know whether or not an atom of the substance has decayed, and consequently, cannot know whether the vial has been broken, the hydrocyanic acid released, and the cat killed. Since we cannot know, the cat is both dead and alive according to quantum law, in a superposition of states. It is only when we break open the box and learn the condition of the cat that the superposition is lost, and the cat becomes one or the other (dead or alive). This situation is sometimes called quantum indeterminacy or the observer's paradox: the observation or measurement itself affects an outcome, so that it can never be known what the outcome would have been if it were not observed.

We know that superposition actually occurs at the subatomic level, because there are observable effects of interference, in which a single particle is demonstrated to be in multiple locations simultaneously. What that fact implies about the nature of reality on the observable level (cats, for example, as opposed to electrons) is one of the stickiest areas of quantum physics. Schrödinger himself is rumored to have said, later in life, that he wished he had never met that cat.

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Time Diolation

In the book I have been reading ( Universe on a T-shirt) we talked abit about Time Dilation... The experiment in the book was if you put a Clock at the bottom of Mount Everest, and one at the TOP of Mount Everest. The one at the bottom would be slower than the one at the top, cause the one at the bottom as more gravity forcing upon it, and the one at the top has less. So I wanted to find some more, so here are some experiments I found off of websites.... Link's will be at bottom of page. (have to give website credit to! :) )

"Time Dilation Experiments

The abandonment of the concept of universal time embodied in the time dilation expression is so counter-intuitive that one must look at the experiments to confirm this extraordinary prediction of special relativity. These are some of the experiments which confirm time dilation.


Muon Experiment

Non-Relativistic






Muon Experiment

Relativistic, Earth-Frame Observer






Kaivola Time Dilation Experiment

A precise measurement of time dilation was made in a double-photon experiment by Kaviola et al. in 1985. An atomic beam of neon atoms at v= 0.004c was excited by two lasers which were collinear with the beam and incident upon the atoms from opposite directions. The absorption frequencies for neon are shifted by both the Doppler effect and time dilation, with the Doppler shift being much larger. By measuring a double photon transition with the two lasers from opposite directions, the Doppler shift was canceled and the time dilation shift measured precisely . The measurement was made by measuring the beat frequency between the two tunable lasers. This experiment confirmed the expected time dilation within 4 parts in 100,000.


Atomic Fine Structure

One of the great successes of the quantum theory was the prediction of the energy levels of the hydrogen atom. When attempts were made to explain the fine structure of the hydrogen spectral lines, it was found that the splitting of the lines was in error by a factor of two. It was realized that relativistic time dilation must be used in calculating the frequencies, and calculations showed that this relativistic correction, called Thomas precession, was the factor of two which was needed for agreement with experiment.


Twin Paradox

The story is that one of a pair of twins leaves on a high speed space journey during which he travels at a large fraction of the speed of light while the other remains on the Earth. Because of time dilation, time is running more slowly in the spacecraft as seen by the earthbound twin and the traveling twin will find that the earthbound twin will be older upon return from the journey. The common question: Is this real? Would one twin really be younger?

The basic question about whether time dilation is real is settled by the muon experiment. The clear implication is that the traveling twin would indeed be younger, but the scenario is complicated by the fact that the traveling twin must be accelerated up to traveling speed, turned around, and decelerated again upon return to Earth. Accelerations are outside the realm of special relativity and require general relativity.

Despite the experimental difficulties, an experiment on a commercial airline confirms the existence of a time difference between ground observers and a reference frame moving with respect to them. "

You can find all of these and more at. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/twin.html#c3 Thank you Hyperphysics.phy for your help..

Also In next week's Post we will be talking about Quantom Theory!!!!!

Monday, November 20, 2006

Life And The Universe (Info about me, and what this blog is about)

Hi Since this is my first post I will explain a bit about me and what I would like to acomplish with this blog.
First my name is Daniel Hathaway, im 14, Live in Sherwood Park Alberta for almost all of my life. My dad is Rus Hathaway; Creator of. T.h.e.e (The Home Education Exchange), Cyber High (Online High School Campous), Datacast Solutions (Datevase Consultant, and Podcasting [ "Turning Info into Knowledge"]), Aspire (Online High school Campous). So as you can see my dad is quite sucsessfull, and he has sold all of those comanies except for Datacast Solutions. I am homeschooled, I am doing grade 9 L.A, and Math...But Science.. O science is mine! I am studying Quantum Physics, Newton Physics, and the universe..... In order to start my verge into the world of Quantum Physics, I am reading The Universe On A Tee-Shirt. It is an interesting book and I suggest to buy it and attempt to read it. So far in the book it has showed me that in the old time (700 bc- 100 ad) there was alot of confusion and lead to the birth of science... Some people think that the birth of science was when the first solar eclipse was predicted... But for now I am reading about the birth of modern science, with Newton, and Galileo. I think Galileo was one of the most sucsessfull scientist, without getting his highschool deploma.. But one of the most famous myths abotu Galileo was that he climbed to the top of the leaning tower of pisa (He lived at this time in Pita) and dropped a ball of coper and a ball of bone.. Same Size, and Weight, and they both hit the ground at the same time, which disproved the theory before of that things (objects and humans) Attract and Repeal from each other based on if they like the ground or not... E.G- if you drop an apple it it hits the ground, it didn't fall cause of gravity, it fell cause the apple likes the ground. If you tripped and fell face first into the ground, it was cause at that time your face loved the ground. Galileo proved gravity, also he witnessed one of the only 2 supernovas in recorded history... One in 1569 that Tycho Brah studied/Witnessed, and One in 1609 which Galileo and Johan Keppler witnessed....

My thery is tho after watching Down the rabbit whole. (good movie to rent explains alot) You are never really touching anything, and if you got down to the mere adams that the spaces between the adams, if yours changes to fit inbetween the spaces, you will become a whole and be able to walk throuhg a wall...


Until Thursday, so long and fair well.
Daniel

(p.s.- I will be blogging every Tuesday, and Thursday...Coments are welcome!!!)